[pgpool-general: 7898] Re: Rejecting database mutations without a quorum

[Tatsuo Ishii]

>> On the other hand I understand your motivation. Allowing to have a
>>> command which is called when watchdog quorum status changes might be a
>>> good idea.
>>>
>>
>> This would be of tremendous help for us, because it will allow us to plug
>> in our own behavior driven directly by Pgpool. This would eliminate the
>> need to poll Pgpool, which I fear will be too unreliable. If a poll fails
>> due to a short glitch, I do not want to bring down a node right away. Also,
>> if the process doing the polling fails for whatever reason, the whole setup
>> will be at risk of corruption.
>>
>> Do you have any concrete plans to implement this callback?

Not yet. We will discuss the idea for Pgpool-II 4.4.

Best reagards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp