[pgpool-general: 7899] Re: Rejecting database mutations without a quorum
emond.papegaaij at gmail.com
Thu Nov 25 21:18:13 JST 2021
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 11:06 AM Tatsuo Ishii <ishii at sraoss.co.jp> wrote:
> >> On the other hand I understand your motivation. Allowing to have a
> >>> command which is called when watchdog quorum status changes might be a
> >>> good idea.
> >> This would be of tremendous help for us, because it will allow us to
> >> in our own behavior driven directly by Pgpool. This would eliminate the
> >> need to poll Pgpool, which I fear will be too unreliable. If a poll
> >> due to a short glitch, I do not want to bring down a node right away.
> >> if the process doing the polling fails for whatever reason, the whole
> >> will be at risk of corruption.
> >> Do you have any concrete plans to implement this callback?
> Not yet. We will discuss the idea for Pgpool-II 4.4.
> In that case, we will go for a temporary solution for now. Thanks for the
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the pgpool-general