[pgpool-general: 7899] Re: Rejecting database mutations without a quorum

Emond Papegaaij emond.papegaaij at gmail.com
Thu Nov 25 21:18:13 JST 2021

On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 11:06 AM Tatsuo Ishii <ishii at sraoss.co.jp> wrote:

> >> On the other hand I understand your motivation. Allowing to have a
> >>> command which is called when watchdog quorum status changes might be a
> >>> good idea.
> >>>
> >>
> >> This would be of tremendous help for us, because it will allow us to
> plug
> >> in our own behavior driven directly by Pgpool. This would eliminate the
> >> need to poll Pgpool, which I fear will be too unreliable. If a poll
> fails
> >> due to a short glitch, I do not want to bring down a node right away.
> Also,
> >> if the process doing the polling fails for whatever reason, the whole
> setup
> >> will be at risk of corruption.
> >>
> >> Do you have any concrete plans to implement this callback?
> Not yet. We will discuss the idea for Pgpool-II 4.4.
> In that case, we will go for a temporary solution for now. Thanks for the

Best regards,
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pgpool.net/pipermail/pgpool-general/attachments/20211125/d4e7ca69/attachment.htm>

More information about the pgpool-general mailing list