[pgpool-general: 7897] Re: Rejecting database mutations without a quorum

[Emond Papegaaij]

>
>
> On the other hand I understand your motivation. Allowing to have a
>> command which is called when watchdog quorum status changes might be a
>> good idea.
>>
>
> This would be of tremendous help for us, because it will allow us to plug
> in our own behavior driven directly by Pgpool. This would eliminate the
> need to poll Pgpool, which I fear will be too unreliable. If a poll fails
> due to a short glitch, I do not want to bring down a node right away. Also,
> if the process doing the polling fails for whatever reason, the whole setup
> will be at risk of corruption.
>
> Do you have any concrete plans to implement this callback?

Best regards,
Emond
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pgpool.net/pipermail/pgpool-general/attachments/20211125/60f0ac0a/attachment.htm>