[Pgpool-general] pgpool-HA active-active configuration Possible?

[John]

Imre Facchin <imre.facchin at ...> writes:

> 
> Sorry for stupid subject line of my last question.I am looking for Failover 
and Loadbalancing in postgresql.my choice is very likely to be pgpool. but i 
have concerns regarding it beeing a SPOF. so i found pgpool-HA.
> but
>  nowhere is a description of what this actually does. I would like to 
> keep all my VMs the same (not have a dedicated DB loadbalancer) So there
>  would be a pgpool server on every database server knowing about all 
> other databases (and which one is the current master). my goal would be to be 
able to talk to any of the 
> pgpool instances and get the same result. the question is will pgpool-HA
>  keep the information about what servers are available/disconnected 
> synchronised over all pgpool instances. or is it just a hot-standby 
> solution where the new pgpool server takes the place of the old one if 
> it fails. if pgpool-ha cant do it is there another way of doing that?tldr; is 
a active:active configuration for pgpool instances possibel with pgpool-HA?
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pgpool-general mailing list
> Pgpool-general at ...
> http://pgfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/pgpool-general
> 

Hi Imre. I have the same problem with synchronization of pgpool instances 
status. Have you any new idea about this?

Thanks.