[pgpool-general: 2275] Re: pgpool-regclass

Devrim GÜNDÜZ devrim at gunduz.org
Wed Nov 13 00:46:00 JST 2013


On Fri, 2013-11-08 at 08:47 +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> > Sorry, what I meant was are there differences in the regcode code in
> pgpool
> > build for 9.2 and pgpool built for 9.0?
> I don't know what you mean "code". If it's the source code, the latest
> pgpool-regclass.c is compatible with PostgreSQL 9.0 and 9.2.

I spent a few hours on this today. For 9.1+, everything is fine.
However, for 9.0, since there is no extension support, we cannot compile
pgpool-regclass and pgpool-recovery stuff. James, I think it is time for
an upgrade, if possible.

Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Community: devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.gunduz.org  Twitter: http://twitter.com/devrimgunduz
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://www.sraoss.jp/pipermail/pgpool-general/attachments/20131112/71ce50d1/attachment.sig>

More information about the pgpool-general mailing list