[pgpool-general: 1478] Re: pgpool-II 3.2.3 - Is it the expected behavior

[David TECHER]

Hi,

Could you give me more details so I can try to reproduce this issue.

I am under the impression that our provider doesn't want to do their jobs (as usual).


Thanks.


________________________________
 De : Lonni J Friedman <netllama at gmail.com>
À : David TECHER <davidtecher at yahoo.fr> 
Cc : "pgpool-general at pgpool.net" <pgpool-general at pgpool.net> 
Envoyé le : Jeudi 7 mars 2013 15h45
Objet : Re: [pgpool-general: 1466] pgpool-II 3.2.3 - Is it the expected behavior
 
This sounds like an old bug which was fixed in 3.2.3.  If you're still
able to reproduce this with 3.2.3, you'll likely need to provide the
pgpool log that includes the problem.

On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 3:52 AM, David TECHER <davidtecher at yahoo.fr> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am PostgreSQL DBA and I am currently testing pgpool-II 3.2.3 with
> streaming replication ( 1 master and 1 slave)
>
> I opened a ticket to our PostgreSQL provider. Our PostgreSQL provider
> (EnterpriseDB) told us that
>
> The issue which we have found in this build is when load_balance mode is on
> and slave is down, pgpool stops giving connection to the master as well.
> Work is currently on for fixing the above issue and also merging the fixes
> in the newer releases like 3.2.2. and 3.2.3.
>
> Our provider sent me the pgpool binaries for 3.2.0 version. Since I wanted
> to be sure that there is the same issue with 3.2.3 version.
> So I built pgpool 3.2.3 against PostgreSQL Plus Advanced Server 9.1.
>
> At work using a dedicated VM for the test, I did a few tests. Indeed when
> the slave is down pgpool is not able to connect to the master.
>
> Is it the expected behavior even if for PostgreSQL 9.1 (Open Source
> Version)?
>
> Thanks for letting me know.
>
> Attached is my  pgpool.conf file.
>
> Jean David TECHER
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.sraoss.jp/pipermail/pgpool-general/attachments/20130310/04824173/attachment.html>