[pgpool-general: 360] Re: Multiple pgpool servers failover
Lou Kamenov
kamenovl at defx.org
Fri Apr 20 10:54:14 JST 2012
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 9:32 PM, Matt Wise <matt at nextdoor.com> wrote:
[..]
> If DISALLOW_TO_FAILOVER is set and ..
> a) one of the slaves fails: that slave is taken out of rotation until its
> back up
> b) the master fails: all connections hang until the master is back, OR a
> new master is detected. pgpool goes into a loop looking for new masters.
I was thinking more about section B, my problem is essentially an
atomic fail-over,
where we are ensured that this is triggered only once.
I will give it a shot and post back my findings.
If anyone else has any ideas, please send them over ;)
cheers,
Lou
More information about the pgpool-general
mailing list