[pgpool-general: 360] Re: Multiple pgpool servers failover

Lou Kamenov kamenovl at defx.org
Fri Apr 20 10:54:14 JST 2012

On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 9:32 PM, Matt Wise <matt at nextdoor.com> wrote:
> If DISALLOW_TO_FAILOVER is set and ..
>   a) one of the slaves fails: that slave is taken out of rotation until its
> back up
>   b) the master fails: all connections hang until the master is back, OR a
> new master is detected. pgpool goes into a loop looking for new masters.

I was thinking more about section B, my problem is essentially an
atomic fail-over,
where we are ensured that this is triggered only once.

I will give it a shot and post back my findings.

If anyone else has any ideas, please send them over ;)


More information about the pgpool-general mailing list