[Pgpool-hackers] Migration to Git

[Tatsuo Ishii]

> On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume at lelarge.info>wrote:
> 
>> On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 16:47 -0400, Gurjeet Singh wrote:
>> > On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 2:13 AM, Guillaume Lelarge
>> > <guillaume at lelarge.info>wrote:
>> >
>> > > On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 11:07 +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
>> > > > > All good news :) Is that conversion script and related
>> conversations
>> > > > > available on some mailing list.
>> > > >
>> > > > Guillaume Lelarge,
>> > > > Are you ok with this?
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > Sure.
>> > >
>> > > All the discussions (apart from a live one in Dalibo's office) were
>> > > public. The main thread is "Exodus from pgfoundry" on pgpool-hackers
>> > > (http://pgfoundry.org/pipermail/pgpool-hackers/2011-June/000768.html).
>> > > On the git conversion, the more interesting one is this one:
>> > > http://pgfoundry.org/pipermail/pgpool-hackers/2011-June/000780.html
>> > >
>> >
>> > Thanks for the pointers :)
>> >
>> > Do you have any timelines on this effort? Just trying to avoid
>> duplicating
>> > the work that community might already be about to finish.
>> >
>>
>> Nope. We first need the repository on git.postgresql.org. Tatsuo
>> probably already has it.
> 
> 
> I don't see it on git.pg.org. If Tatsuo has already submitted a request for
> a repository, it might take time since I *think* the approval process over
> there is manual and may take anywhere from days to weeks, unless you nudge
> someone on the IRC/pgsql-hackers list.

Yes, I have submitted the request several days ago and still waiting
for reply.  Maybe I should post to pgsql-hackers to push the approval
process?
> 
>> Then, I guess we just need the time to do it,
>> even if it shouldn't be long.
>>
> 
> On the recent pgpool-committers list [2] I see that it is Kitagawa and
> T-ishii who are most active, and sometimes Bambo too, so probably we need to
> coordinate with just the two of them for the Git migration as they would be
> the most affected by it in short-term.
> 
> 
>>
>> > I see that those conversations are now 4  months old, and one of the 2
>> > concerns raised (multi-byte chracters) has been addressed. Any other
>> pending
>> > concerns that we are waiting for?
>> >
>>
>> Not that I know. You were talking about two concerns, the multibyte one
>> and another one. Which is the other one?

I think the multibyte concern was already solved by Toshiiro.

> I was talking about the 2 'TODO' items you mentioned at the end of your
> email [2]; the other concern being the name/email pairs in default.options
> being outdated.
>
> Regards,
> 
> [1] http://lists.pgfoundry.org/pipermail/pgpool-committers/
> [2] http://pgfoundry.org/pipermail/pgpool-hackers/2011-June/000780.html
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese: http://www.sraoss.co.jp