[Pgpool-general] follow up on pg_terminate_backend bug

[Lee, Mija]

Hi -

I am looking at pgpool for connection pooling only. I have been
following these threads:

 

http://pgfoundry.org/pipermail/pgpool-general/2010-May/002704.html

http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/How-to-know-killed-by-pg-termina
te-backend-td2017927.html

 

It's not clear to me from the release notes if the proposed patch made
it into version 3.0, or if the use of pg_terminate_backend should still
be avoided with pgpool with one node/no failover?

 

Mija

 

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments,
is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential, proprietary, and/or privileged information protected by
law. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not use, copy, or
distribute this e-mail message or its attachments. If you believe you
have received this e-mail message in error, please contact the sender by
reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://pgfoundry.org/pipermail/pgpool-general/attachments/20110118/e91e39c3/attachment.html>