[pgpool-hackers: 4074] Re: Proposal: add validations of wd_lifecheck_password and recovery_password format.

[Tatsuo Ishii]

Hi Kawamoto-san,

Unfortunately the commit caused regression test failures. I have
reverted the patch to prevent build-farm failure.

I should have reviewed more carefully. Sorry.

Best reagards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp

> Hi,
> 
> Thanks!
> I commited.
> 
> Best regards.
> 
> On Fri, 10 Dec 2021 10:02:57 +0900 (JST)
> Tatsuo Ishii <ishii at sraoss.co.jp> wrote:
> 
>> > Hi,
>> > 
>> > I have confirmed that this patch works on a stable branch except V3_7.
>> > 
>> > I'm thinking of committing this patch to V4_3, V4_2, V4_1, V4_0. 
>> > This is because pgpool allows the AES encryption format to be set for
>> > recovery_password and wd_lifecheck_password from V4_0, and up to V3_7
>> > they could only be set directly in pgpool.conf in plain text format.
>> > 
>> > I think V3_7 users are not confused without this fix. 
>> 
>> Sounds good to me.
>> 
>> Best reagards,
>> --
>> Tatsuo Ishii
>> SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
>> English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
>> Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp
> 
> 
> -- 
> KAWAMOTO Masaya <kawamoto at sraoss.co.jp>
> SRA OSS, Inc. Japan