[pgpool-general: 8275] Re: libpcp.so conflict

Filip Janus fjanus at redhat.com
Thu Jun 30 16:26:20 JST 2022

Ok, thank you for your effort.


čt 30. 6. 2022 v 7:05 odesílatel Bo Peng <pengbo at sraoss.co.jp> napsal:

> Hi,
> > Hi all,
> > I maintain pgpool-II in Fedora and I have found that pgpool provides a
> > library named libpcp.so. And also another project Performance Co-Pilot
> > provides a library with the name libpcp.so. So I would like to ask
> whether
> > there is a possibility to change this name within Your project? I
> > understand that it could be a big change but nonetheless, it could be
> > beneficial for pgpool to use some more intuitive name for the library.
> Thank you for pointing out the library conflict issue.
> Our development team will consider your suggestion.
> We'll discuss if the library file needs to be renamed
> and ask the other packager's opinions.
> Because it's a big change, we need time to make the decision.
> I will let you know when we have a conclusion.
> Best regards,
> --
> Bo Peng <pengbo at sraoss.co.jp>
> SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
> https://www.sraoss.co.jp/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pgpool.net/pipermail/pgpool-general/attachments/20220630/645682fe/attachment.htm>

More information about the pgpool-general mailing list