[pgpool-general: 8345] Re: libpcp.so conflict

Tatsuo Ishii ishii at sraoss.co.jp
Tue Jul 19 17:32:29 JST 2022

Hi Filip,

I think Co-Pilot is a long history project. I wonder why you noticed
the library name conflict recently. Can you please elaborate?

Best reagards,
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php

> Ok, thank you for your effort.
>     -Filip-
> čt 30. 6. 2022 v 7:05 odesílatel Bo Peng <pengbo at sraoss.co.jp> napsal:
>> Hi,
>> > Hi all,
>> > I maintain pgpool-II in Fedora and I have found that pgpool provides a
>> > library named libpcp.so. And also another project Performance Co-Pilot
>> > provides a library with the name libpcp.so. So I would like to ask
>> whether
>> > there is a possibility to change this name within Your project? I
>> > understand that it could be a big change but nonetheless, it could be
>> > beneficial for pgpool to use some more intuitive name for the library.
>> Thank you for pointing out the library conflict issue.
>> Our development team will consider your suggestion.
>> We'll discuss if the library file needs to be renamed
>> and ask the other packager's opinions.
>> Because it's a big change, we need time to make the decision.
>> I will let you know when we have a conclusion.
>> Best regards,
>> --
>> Bo Peng <pengbo at sraoss.co.jp>
>> SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
>> https://www.sraoss.co.jp/

More information about the pgpool-general mailing list