[pgpool-general: 7112] Pooling doesn't appear to be working.
Matthew Tice
mjtice at gmail.com
Thu Jul 2 03:18:39 JST 2020
Hi Guys,
When I list the output of SHOW POOL_POOLS, all the pools have a pool_counter=1
and a distinct pool_backendpid. To me this means that even though I have
the same users connecting, with the same major/minor, connection pools
aren't being reused. Is that correct? Here's a snippet (I have three
backends):
141204 | 2020-07-01 11:04:21 | 0 | 0 | mobile-search-bff
| v-token-mo-mobile-s-yAjmcIzpEvK | 2020-07-01 12:16:19 | 3
| 0 | 1 | 12047 | 1
141204 | 2020-07-01 11:04:21 | 0 | 1 | mobile-search-bff
| v-token-mo-mobile-s-yAjmcIzpEvK | 2020-07-01 12:16:19 | 3
| 0 | 1 | 60420 | 1
141204 | 2020-07-01 11:04:21 | 0 | 2 | mobile-search-bff
| v-token-mo-mobile-s-yAjmcIzpEvK | 2020-07-01 12:16:19 | 3
| 0 | 1 | 137228 | 1
141515 | 2020-07-01 11:04:21 | 1 | 0 | mobile-search-bff
| v-token-mo-mobile-s-yAjmcIzpEvK | 2020-07-01 12:16:19 | 3
| 0 | 1 | 12049 | 1
141515 | 2020-07-01 11:04:21 | 1 | 1 | mobile-search-bff
| v-token-mo-mobile-s-yAjmcIzpEvK | 2020-07-01 12:16:19 | 3
| 0 | 1 | 60428 | 1
141515 | 2020-07-01 11:04:21 | 1 | 2 | mobile-search-bff
| v-token-mo-mobile-s-yAjmcIzpEvK | 2020-07-01 12:16:19 | 3
| 0 | 1 | 137235 | 1
173903 | 2020-07-01 12:11:17 | 0 | 0 | mobile-search-bff
| v-token-mo-mobile-s-yAjmcIzpEvK | 2020-07-01 12:16:19 | 3
| 0 | 1 | 12050 | 1
173903 | 2020-07-01 12:11:17 | 0 | 1 | mobile-search-bff
| v-token-mo-mobile-s-yAjmcIzpEvK | 2020-07-01 12:16:19 | 3
| 0 | 1 | 60430 | 1
173903 | 2020-07-01 12:11:17 | 0 | 2 | mobile-search-bff
| v-token-mo-mobile-s-yAjmcIzpEvK | 2020-07-01 12:16:19 | 3
| 0 | 1 | 137237 | 1
173620 | 2020-07-01 12:10:42 | 0 | 0 | mobile-search-bff
| v-token-mo-mobile-s-yAjmcIzpEvK | 2020-07-01 12:16:19 | 3
| 0 | 1 | 12052 | 1
173620 | 2020-07-01 12:10:42 | 0 | 1 | mobile-search-bff
| v-token-mo-mobile-s-yAjmcIzpEvK | 2020-07-01 12:16:19 | 3
| 0 | 1 | 60433 | 1
173620 | 2020-07-01 12:10:42 | 0 | 2 | mobile-search-bff
| v-token-mo-mobile-s-yAjmcIzpEvK | 2020-07-01 12:16:19 | 3
| 0 | 1 | 137242 | 1
173094 | 2020-07-01 12:09:36 | 0 | 0 | mobile-search-bff
| v-token-mo-mobile-s-yAjmcIzpEvK | 2020-07-01 12:16:19 | 3
| 0 | 1 | 12051 | 1
173094 | 2020-07-01 12:09:36 | 0 | 1 | mobile-search-bff
| v-token-mo-mobile-s-yAjmcIzpEvK | 2020-07-01 12:16:19 | 3
| 0 | 1 | 60431 | 1
173094 | 2020-07-01 12:09:36 | 0 | 2 | mobile-search-bff
| v-token-mo-mobile-s-yAjmcIzpEvK | 2020-07-01 12:16:19 | 3
| 0 | 1 | 137239 | 1
The only thing I can think of is that it may have something to do with the
user names (these are Vault-generated users).
I do have the connection cache parameter on:
connection_cache on
I'm using PgPool-II v. 4.1.1.
Thanks,
Matt
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pgpool.net/pipermail/pgpool-general/attachments/20200701/bb216ab5/attachment.htm>
More information about the pgpool-general
mailing list