[pgpool-general: 6762] Re: Watchdog does not get consensus for failover

[shacky]

Il giorno mar 29 ott 2019 alle ore 23:57 Tatsuo Ishii <ishii at sraoss.co.jp>
ha scritto:

> Thanks. I confirmed that pgpool at proxy2 and proxy3 did not detect
> the failure of postgres1. So watchdog at proxy1 did not get
> consensus. I suspect the way you stopped postgres was something special
> (not ordinary shutdown by using pg_ctl). Can you elaborate how you
> stopped postgres1?
>

I used "service postgresql stop" on postgres1. And then "start" to start it
again.

So I have one question: why you ask me this? Does this mean that if
PostgreSQL would be killed in an "abnormal way" (like kernel hang, memory
or something else not made by user) the failover does not work?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.sraoss.jp/pipermail/pgpool-general/attachments/20191030/0754b32d/attachment.html>