[pgpool-general: 6669] Re: active/active with Consul service
mjtice at gmail.com
Fri Aug 9 22:07:08 JST 2019
I guess mainly I'm concerned that by having this "active/active"
configuration I may cause some problems. Looking at the documentation this
When a backend node status changes by failover etc.., watchdog notifies the
> information to other Pgpool-II nodes and synchronizes them. When online
> recovery occurs, watchdog restricts client connections to other Pgpool-II nodes
> for avoiding inconsistency between backends.
What is the "inconsistency", specifically? I'm not opposed to using
watchdog per se, I just don't want to have to manage a vip when I can use
the functionality included in my consul cluster.
On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 2:51 PM Pierre Timmermans <ptim007 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> I believe this will work but i don't see a real plus value for pgpool in
> this set-up
> Note that the watchdog mode of pgpool works with two nodes, simply you
> should protect against a network partition (for this you need a third
> server that can act as a trusted server, you just need an IP address not
> the server)
> Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
> On Thu, 8 Aug 2019 at 22:36, Matthew Tice
> <mjtice at gmail.com> wrote:
> pgpool-general mailing list
> pgpool-general at pgpool.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the pgpool-general