[pgpool-general: 5624] Re: pgpool 3.6.4 failover - failover scenario question

Muhammad Usama m.usama at gmail.com
Mon Jul 17 20:27:16 JST 2017


Hi,

There doesn't seems to be anything wrong with the configuration or cluster
design, And if the secondary Pgpool-II is successfully escalating to the
master Pgpool-II and acquiring the VIP, It should also perform the backend
node failover without any problem.

Can you please elaborate the situation what actually is the behaviour of
Pgpool-II after the server1 failure.

1- Does Pgpool-II (on server 2) performs the backend failover but it does
not promotes the standby PostgreSQL to primary?
2 - Or is it the case where Pgpool-II never performs the failover.

Also It would be really helpful if you can share the pgpool log file when
this situation occurs.

Thanks
Best regards
Muhammad Usama

On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 9:56 PM, Shay Cohavi <cohavisi at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> I have 2 postgres servers (postgres 9.3.5) installed with pgpool(3.6.4) on
> the same node.
>
>
> server1 192.168.15.55
> server 2 192.168.15.56
> pgpool vip 192.168.15.59
>
>
>
>>
>
> # psql -U postgres -h 192.168.15.59 -p 9999 -c 'show pool_nodes'
>  node_id |   hostname    | port | status | lb_weight |  role   |
> select_cnt | load_balance_node | replication_delay
> ---------+---------------+------+--------+-----------+------
> ---+------------+-------------------+-------------------
>  0       | 192.168.15.55 | 5432 | up     | 0.500000  | primary | 3718
>   | true              | 0
>  1       | 192.168.15.56 | 5432 | up     | 0.500000  | standby | 0
>  | false             | 0
>
>
>
> my question is about disaster recovery scenario:
>
> 1. *"primary postgres" and the "master pgpool" is on server1* . pgpool
> vip established on this node (192.168.15.59)
>
> 2. server1 went down due to  power break. (server1 is dead!!!)
>
> 3. pgpool on server server2 get promoted (vip established 192.168.15.59) .
>
> 4. NO postgres failover action occurs by the pgpool. pgpool keeps
> searching for primary postgres with no success.
>
> should the new master pgpool execute an failover action(promote) to the
> slave postgres ??
>
>
>
> Thanks,
> cohavisi
>
> _______________________________________________
> pgpool-general mailing list
> pgpool-general at pgpool.net
> http://www.pgpool.net/mailman/listinfo/pgpool-general
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.sraoss.jp/pipermail/pgpool-general/attachments/20170717/e876c99d/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Untitled drawing.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 41138 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.sraoss.jp/pipermail/pgpool-general/attachments/20170717/e876c99d/attachment-0001.jpg>


More information about the pgpool-general mailing list