[pgpool-general: 3629] Re: version Option

[Alex Toth]

Is back patching really necessary?  It seems like a small enough change
that putting it in the release notes and applying it to the next dot
release is plenty.


  alex

On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Rodrigo Ramírez Norambuena <
decipher.hk at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 03:37:09PM +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> > Rodrigo,
> >
> > Thanks for pointing it out. Yeah, when "-v" provided, it should be to
> > stdout according to the Linux convention.
>
> Good!
>
> > However I a little bit worried about the backward compatibility if
> > this should be back patched. Is there anyone who depends on the
> > current behavior (the output goes to stderr)?
>
> I dont know this point.  What other app could depends of this option?
>
> > Best regards,
>
> Regards,
> --
> Rodrigo Ramírez Norambuena
> www.rodrigoramirez.com
> _______________________________________________
> pgpool-general mailing list
> pgpool-general at pgpool.net
> http://www.pgpool.net/mailman/listinfo/pgpool-general
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.sraoss.jp/pipermail/pgpool-general/attachments/20150415/33611128/attachment-0001.html>