[pgpool-general: 3270] Re: Execution of command failed

Tatsuo Ishii ishii at postgresql.org
Thu Nov 13 12:37:40 JST 2014

> Thank you for your quick reply!
> Ah yes I misunderstood.  I thought pgpool called the first stage script.
> Am I reading this right?  It looks like pgpool_recovery is being called
> with 4 arguments, but the function only takes 3 arguments.

Yes. From pgpool-II 3.4.0, pgpool_recovery starts to accept 4
arguments. Probably your pgpool_recovery installation on PostgreSQL is
outdated. Please update.

More information about the pgpool-general mailing list