[pgpool-general: 2715] Re: existing connections did not close in 0 sec

[Sean Hogan]

On 14-04-07 10:17 AM, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
>> Yes, of course you are correct. However in the pgpool.conf file itself
>> it just says "Timeout in seconds to wait for the recovering node's
>> postmaster to start up" which is what misled me.
> Good point. Can you please propose better wording?

How about "Maximum total running time of recovery stage 2, in seconds, 
including postmaster startup on the recovering node"?

Sean
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: sean.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 275 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.sraoss.jp/pipermail/pgpool-general/attachments/20140407/f692f08b/attachment.vcf>