[pgpool-general: 2307] Re: PGPool and backend CPU usage
stelios.limnaios at mekon.com
Thu Nov 21 01:06:11 JST 2013
We are not using master/slave, but replication + load balancing
Please find attached our pgpool.conf.
From: Tatsuo Ishii [mailto:ishii at postgresql.org]
Sent: 20 November 2013 14:49
To: Stelios Limnaios
Cc: pgpool-general at pgpool.net
Subject: Re: [pgpool-general: 2279] Re: PGPool and backend CPU usage
> Hi Tatsuo,
> Thank you very much for your response.
> We do have configured the white and the black list:
> White: get*,has*
> Black: nextval,setval,update*
> We recently found that there are more custom functions that we should add in the lists.
> There is a point of confusion around the lists.
> We came across this page:
> and "Only one of these two lists can be filled in a configuration."
> Is that correct? It is not very obvious in documentation
> Also, does all this explain the I/O exception to the backend?
> Is this exception a result of functions not being in the black list?
I'm not sure any more. After rethinking, I realized that the error cannot happen in master/slave mode. Can you please show your pgpool.conf?
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
> Thank you again,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tatsuo Ishii [mailto:ishii at postgresql.org]
> Sent: 14 November 2013 23:00
> To: Stelios Limnaios
> Cc: pgpool-general at pgpool.net
> Subject: Re: [pgpool-general: 2279] Re: PGPool and backend CPU usage
> If you are using PostgreSQL's streaming replication, your porblem shouldn't happen because read only SELECTs should be sent to only one node and the kind mismach error will never happen. I think pgpool thinks that lower() is a writing function and the SELECT needed to be sent to all nodes. This could be solved by teaching pgpool which function is not read only by using black_black_function_list in pgpool.conf.
> Tatsuo Ishii
> SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
> English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
> Japanese: http://www.sraoss.co.jp
>> You are correct, we're using PostgreSQL replication.
>> We upgraded PGPool to version 3.3.1, but we still are getting 'backend mismatch' errors.
>> I think that CPU overload is not the cause of the problem anymore.
>> Do you have any idea how can we track what is causing backends to loose synchronisation?
>> PGPool logs only the action of degeneration:
>> read_kind_from_backend: 0 th kind C does not match with master or
>> majority connection kind D kind mismatch among backends. Possible
>> last query was: "SELECT name,id,type,creator FROM notus_aqa.tree_node
>> LEFT JOIN notus_aqa.branch ON id=child_id WHERE parent_id=$1 AND
>> lower(name)=$2" kind details are: 0[C] 1[D] 2[D]
>> degenerate_backend_set: 0 fail over request from pid 22833 starting
>> degeneration. shutdown host 188.8.131.52(5433) Restart all children
>> execute command: /usr/local/etc/failover_r.sh 0 "184.108.40.206" 5433
>> /var/lib/pgsql/9.1/data_5433 1 0 "220.127.116.11" 0
>> On the Postgre side, we get this log message:
>> LOG: unexpected EOF on client connection
>> Finally Java reports:
>> org.postgresql.util.PSQLException: An I/O error occured while sending to the backend.
>> Caused by: java.io.EOFException
>> So, maybe we need to understand what is causing this EOF on client connection.
>> Does PGPool drop the connection to Postgres for some reason?
>> Is it a timeout that we need to configure? Is network latency a factor to this problem?
>> Many thanks for your interest and you time.
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Tatsuo Ishii [mailto:ishii at postgresql.org]
>> Sent: 09 November 2013 08:57
>> To: Stelios Limnaios
>> Cc: pgpool-general at pgpool.net
>> Subject: Re: [pgpool-general: 2263] PGPool and backend CPU usage
>> How do you set up pgpool replication? Are you using streaming replication of PostgreSQL?
>> Tatsuo Ishii
>> SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
>> English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
>> Japanese: http://www.sraoss.co.jp
>>> Hi all,
>>> We're facing a situation that would like some expertise to be solved.
>>> First of all, our setup consists of 3 databases Postgres 9.1, PGPool 3.2 STABLE checked out from the repository (rev 6dde744) and PGPoolAdmin 3.2.0.
>>> We have setup replication and load balancing, along with scripts for online recovery.
>>> The cluster works fine in terms of replicating and load balancing data.
>>> But, the servers host other applications expect of the databases.
>>> Some applications require a lot of CPU when running.
>>> We found recently that when CPU is high in a backend, PGPool fails to update the data on this server and that causes a 'kind mismatch among backends' situation.
>>> I know that there is a replication_stop_on_mismatch parameter in pgpool conf, but that will disconnect the database from the cluster and we will have to re-attach it (this could happen several times).
>>> So I was wondering, if there is a more permanent workaround for this.
>>> Is it something we can configure in PGPool?
>>> Are there any minimum memory requirements that we could set to avoid this problem?
>>> Would that be in Postgres?
>>> Maybe the best option is to dedicate the server to run the database only (?).
>>> Thanks in advance for your help and your time.
>> pgpool-general mailing list
>> pgpool-general at pgpool.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 5423 bytes
More information about the pgpool-general