[pgpool-general: 1810] Re: pgpool vs. pgbouncer

Tatsuo Ishii ishii at postgresql.org
Fri May 31 00:35:16 JST 2013

> We are using both.
> PgBouncer is in front used as a connection pooler, then it connects to
> PgPool, which we use for load balancing only. We are using the built-in
> streaming replication.
> We didn't benchmark, but noticed that PgBouncer is behaving a bit better
> as connection pooler, yet it lacks the load balancing functionality of
> PgPool.

So pgbouncer is running in transaction mode? If so, how many
connections from clients to pgbouncer?
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese: http://www.sraoss.co.jp

More information about the pgpool-general mailing list