[pgpool-general: 1802] Re: pgpool vs. pgbouncer
ishii at postgresql.org
Thu May 30 07:37:05 JST 2013
> On 05/26/2013 08:29 AM, Jeff Frost wrote:
>> I think pgbouncer will really shine when it is running locally on the
>> application server with a separate PostgreSQL server.
>> Also, I'm not sure 10 clients with 1 thread is large enough contention
>> to push the performance of either pgpool or pgbouncer.
> Agreed. Although I do think seeing the slower portion of pgbench is
> interesting for the standard pooling case. I wonder, does pgpool-ii
> parse even when in just pooling mode?
BTW, by knowing that pgbouncer's transaction mode is alomost 40%
slower than session mode, I noticed what people wants to have is not
just throughput, but the ability to allow large number of concurrent
connections unless pgbouncers's user rarely use the transaction mode.
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
More information about the pgpool-general