[pgpool-general: 1770] Re: Persistent "Idle in transaction" connections
glynastill at yahoo.co.uk
Thu May 23 06:17:26 JST 2013
> From: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii at postgresql.org>
> To: glynastill at yahoo.co.uk
> Cc: jperez at oteara.com; pgpool-general at pgpool.net
> Sent: Wednesday, 22 May 2013, 11:40
> Subject: Re: [pgpool-general: 1765] Re: Persistent "Idle in transaction"
> No, connection_life_time is for between pgpool and PostgreSQL, not
> client and pgpool. So client_idle_limit is the right choice. However
> we recently found a problem which might be related to Juan's problem.
Ah, I'd always assumed it was for both sides; sorry for barging in with a wrong answer!
More information about the pgpool-general