[pgpool-general: 1066] Re: JDBC, PGPOOL and unexpected EOF on client connection
stelios.limnaios at mekon.com
Wed Oct 3 16:18:15 JST 2012
Please find attached the PGPool log file.
The error occurred at 07:58:22.
I think this message:
2012-10-03 07:58:22 LOG: pid 2114: pool_read_kind: error message from 1 th backend:database "notus" does not exist
is misleading, as the database 'notus' does exist. We can connect to it using the Postgres port (5432) in the jdbc url.
Again thank you all for your quick responses.
From: Tatsuo Ishii [mailto:ishii at postgresql.org]
Sent: 03 October 2012 00:06
To: Stelios Limnaios
Cc: pgpool-general at pgpool.net
Subject: Re: [pgpool-general: 1063] JDBC, PGPOOL and unexpected EOF on client connection
Can you show us pgpool log?
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
> I kindly need your help and expertise on a strange situation we're facing when using PGPool II.
> Our setup is 2 Centos 5.3 servers with installed Postgres 9.1 (on port 5432) and PGPool II 220.127.116.11 (on port 9999).
> What we want to do, is to establish replication between the 2 servers, with one to serve as the main server and the other as the standby.
> To achieve that, we followed the instructions in this tutorial:
> and we managed to successfully establish replication.
> When we run (as postgres)
> createddb -p 9999 dbname
> on the main server then we can see the changes on the standby server.
> So far, so good.
> The problem we've got is when Java come into play.
> For some reason Java applications are not able establish a connection to PGPool but are able to do it to the Postgres server.
> For example, connecting to jdbc:postgresql://localhost:9999/dbname and running SELECT VERSION() throws an error.
> But, if we connect to jdbc:postgresql://localhost:5432/dbname we get back some results.
> The error in Postgres log is:
> LOG: unexpected EOF on client connection
> This is strange, as createdb -p 9999 connects to PGPool with no problem.
> So, we set loglevel=2 to the jdbc url in order to get some more advanced network messages and we got:
> PostgreSQL 9.1 JDBC4 (build 901)
> Trying to establish a protocol version 3 connection to localhost:9999
> FE=> StartupPacket(user=postgres, database=dbname,
> client_encoding=UTF8, DateStyle=ISO, extra_float_digits=2) <=BE
> org.postgresql.util.PSQLException: The connection attempt failed.
> at org.postgresql.core.v3.ConnectionFactoryImpl.openConnectionImpl(ConnectionFactoryImpl.java:152)
> at org.postgresql.core.ConnectionFactory.openConnection(ConnectionFactory.java:66)
> at org.postgresql.jdbc2.AbstractJdbc2Connection.<init>(AbstractJdbc2Connection.java:125)
> at org.postgresql.jdbc3.AbstractJdbc3Connection.<init>(AbstractJdbc3Connection.java:30)
> at org.postgresql.jdbc3g.AbstractJdbc3gConnection.<init>(AbstractJdbc3gConnection.java:22)
> at org.postgresql.jdbc4.AbstractJdbc4Connection.<init>(AbstractJdbc4Connection.java:32)
> at org.postgresql.jdbc4.Jdbc4Connection.<init>(Jdbc4Connection.java:24)
> at org.postgresql.Driver.makeConnection(Driver.java:393)
> at org.postgresql.Driver.connect(Driver.java:267)
> at java.sql.DriverManager.getConnection(DriverManager.java:582)
> at java.sql.DriverManager.getConnection(DriverManager.java:185)
> at replication.Main.printVersion(Main.java:41)
> at replication.Main.main(Main.java:23)
> SQLException: SQLState(08001)
> getConnection failed: org.postgresql.util.PSQLException: The connection attempt failed.
> We looked for SQLState (08001) and for Postgres it means that 'sql client unable to establish connection'.
> And this is where we ran out of ideas.
> So, to summarize, we're in a situation where replication has been established successfully on port 9999.
> Java (jdbc) can connect with success to Postgres (5432) but not to PGPool (9999), as the connection gets terminated for some reason right after AuthenticationOK is sent to the client.
> (I don't know if that is important to mention but we have opened ports
> 5432, 9999 and 9898 for tcp connections on both server firewalls)
> Do you have any ideas what is causing this problem?
> Any help and directions will be much appreciated.
> Kind regards,
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: pgpool [07-58-22].log
Size: 39760 bytes
Desc: pgpool [07-58-22].log
More information about the pgpool-general