[Pgpool-hackers] Exodus from pgfoundry

[Tatsuo Ishii]

> On Fri, 2011-10-28 at 23:30 +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
>> > BTW, something that first surprises me is that cvs2git doesn't convert
>> > each cvs branch in a git branch. It does that because the cvs branch was
>> > not used, hence it is not needed. We could create the branch afterwards
>> > if we need it.
>> 
>> Question is, actually there are branches in the cvs repository.
>> 
>> [t-ishii at localhost pgpool-II]$ cvs status README
>> ===================================================================
>> File: README           	Status: Up-to-date
>> 
>>    Working revision:	1.2
>>    Repository revision:	1.2	/cvsroot/pgpool/pgpool-II/README,v
>>    Sticky Tag:		V3_1_STABLE (branch: 1.2.14)
>>    Sticky Date:		(none)
>>    Sticky Options:	(none)
>> 
>> Why do you think that branch was not used?
>> 
> 
> It didn't speak about that branch (obviously because it didn't exist at
> the time).

You are right about this particular branch. But how about this?

[check out V2_2_STABLE branch]

[t-ishii at localhost pgpool-II]$ cvs status pool_process_query.c
===================================================================
File: pool_process_query.c	Status: Up-to-date

   Working revision:	1.141.2.39
   Repository revision:	1.141.2.39	/cvsroot/pgpool/pgpool-II/pool_process_query.c,v
   Sticky Tag:		V2_2_STABLE (branch: 1.141.2)
   Sticky Date:		(none)
   Sticky Options:	(none)

[t-ishii at localhost pgpool-II]$ cvs log pool_process_query.c

RCS file: /cvsroot/pgpool/pgpool-II/pool_process_query.c,v
Working file: pool_process_query.c
head: 1.268
branch:
locks: strict
access list:
symbolic names:
	V3_1_STABLE: 1.267.0.2
	V3_1_0: 1.267
[snip]
	V2_2_5: 1.141.2.22
	V2_2_4: 1.141.2.18
	V2_2_3: 1.141.2.15
	V2_2_2: 1.141.2.4
	V2_2_1: 1.141.2.3
	V2_2_0: 1.141
	V2_2_STABLE: 1.141.0.2
[snip]

----------------------------
revision 1.141
date: 2009/02/24 02:20:40;  author: t-ishii;  state: Exp;  lines: +34 -6
branches:  1.141.2;
Prpare for receiving parameter status packets.
[snip]

Apparently V2_2_STABLE branch was there when you posted original message.

>> Anyway, if cvs2git does not convert each branch in a git branch, thing
>> goes worst. Because any changes which are newer than HEAD made to a
>> branch are lost in the converted git repository.
> 
> It does the work all right.
> 
> 
> -- 
> Guillaume
>   http://blog.guillaume.lelarge.info
>   http://www.dalibo.com
>