[Pgpool-hackers] proposal for new feature

[mitani]

Yes, basically, (1) and (2) should be in configuration file.
However, if pgpool required dynamically adding to system, 
these basic informations might be in a shared repository.

Regards,
--
At.Mitani

On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 21:46:15 +0100
Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume at lelarge.info> wrote:

> On Mon, 2011-11-21 at 10:48 +0900, mitani at sraw.co.jp wrote:
> > Hi Guillaume,
> > Thank you for quick comments.
> > 
> > I think some informations are required for redundancy as follows,
> > (1) the basic information of each pgpool like a port and IP address etc.
> > (2) the basic information of DB servers like a port, IP address etc.
> > (3) the status of each pgpool like a master/slave and running/standby/stop etc.
> > (4) the status of DB servers like a master/slave and running/standby/stop etc.
> > 
> > I think that the redundant process might be work based on these informations.
> > 
> 
> Well, 1, and 2 should be in configuration files. 3, and 4 seem more
> likely to be required in a shared pool of informations.
> 
> 
> -- 
> Guillaume
>   http://blog.guillaume.lelarge.info
>   http://www.dalibo.com
> 
> 
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 6649 (20111121) __________
> 
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> 
> http://www.eset.com
> 
> 
> 


-- 
mitani <mitani at sraw.co.jp>