[Pgpool-hackers] Exodus from pgfoundry

Tatsuo Ishii ishii at sraoss.co.jp
Wed Jun 1 15:31:51 UTC 2011


> On 01/06/2011 11:14, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
>>>> 4) Prepare everything necessary for the new server
>>>
>>> Well, my only concern here would be to have yet another login credential.
>> 
>> No way:-)
>> 
>>>>    - Source repository (probably starting with CVS, then migrate to
>>>>      git.hub?)
>>>
>>> github would be perfect for 3.1. Do you have an account ? You can create
>>> the pgpool organization here, but all pgpool commiters need all to have
>>> a github account then.

It seems git.postgresql.org is another choice...

>> My concern is, I would like to bring CVS histories to git. I know
>> PostgreSQL developers worked very hard and took long time to do that.
>> If it takes so long time, we need to continue to use CVS.
> 
> AFAIK, Guillaume Lelarge is working on this.
> 
> In my opinion, as soon as 3.1 is out, we should freeze the development
> and focus on cvs -> git conversation whatever it takes. We already
> discussed the problem inherited from cvs while thinking about releasing
> 3.1 sooner, we should not use CVS for 3.2.

I expect git conversion finishes within 1 or 2 days at most. I don't
want to be blocked by the conversion work.

>>>>    - Mailing lists
>>>
>>> Following our discussion during the PGCon2011, I think we can ask for a
>>> dedicated mailing list @postgresql.org
>> 
>> Well, I would like to use my own mailing list server. What I want to
>> do is, assigned sequence number in subject. This is extremly
>> usefull. It's a "logical unique identifier" for each message and
>> people could easily referer to particular message. I will have hard
>> time to move existing pgfoundry mail archives because they don't have
>> the "logical identifier".
>> 
>>>>    - Wiki and blogs
>>>
>>> Yeah, the website and a wiki could be hosted on your pgpool.net server I
>>> guess. But then, it would be awesome if the wiki could authenticate
>>> using our postgresql community accounts.
>> 
>> Do you know how to do it techinicaly?
>> 
>>> I'm not personally convinced about blogs though.
>> 
>> Me too:-) Just it seems every develper site has "developer blogs"
>> these days. Probably the blog is used only for site managers.
>> 
>>>>    - Others?
>>>>
>>>> 5) All active pgpool committers will have an account on the site.
>>>>
>>>> Anything I miss? Comments are welcome.
>>>> --
>>>> Tatsuo Ishii
>>>> SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
>>>> English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
>>>> Japanese: http://www.sraoss.co.jp
>>>
>>> - -- 
>>> Jehan-Guillaume (ioguix) de Rorthais
>>> DBA
>>> http://www.dalibo.com
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
>>> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>>>
>>> iEYEARECAAYFAk3l/AcACgkQXu9L1HbaT6K8HgCglAj/7+F0TIykjQ4Oh5PxFySP
>>> FXYAn31ITGmKM7psKImGxBGfSgOEEen5
>>> =nEvy
>>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> 
> - -- 
> Jehan-Guillaume (ioguix) de Rorthais
> DBA
> http://www.dalibo.com
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
> 
> iEYEARECAAYFAk3mGY8ACgkQXu9L1HbaT6K8SwCeJerp1plse0WkR+TwolZO+IsB
> 8p4Ani9XvJvAhxROhhh4VZBxxGbP79gr
> =2Yl4
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the Pgpool-hackers mailing list