[Pgpool-hackers] Admin interface, statistics views, etc

Guillaume Lelarge guillaume at lelarge.info
Tue Aug 10 13:23:15 UTC 2010


Le 07/08/2010 01:16, Tatsuo Ishii a écrit :
>> Le 06/08/2010 03:14, Tatsuo Ishii a écrit :
>>>> Le 03/08/2010 13:29, Guillaume Lelarge a écrit :
>>>>> Le 03/08/2010 12:23, Tatsuo Ishii a écrit :
>>>>>>> Le 03/08/2010 03:48, Tatsuo Ishii a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>> AFAICT, it works really good. We still miss pgsql_pid. And should I add
>>>>>>>>>>> some other reports? what do other people need?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> No comments on this patch? meaning I should commit it or not?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I was waiting for you add pgsql_pid. Have you done it?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I have added new function:
>>>>>>>> /*
>>>>>>>>  * Return pointer to i th child, j th connection pool and k th backend
>>>>>>>>  * of connection info on shmem.
>>>>>>>>  */
>>>>>>>> ConnectionInfo *pool_coninfo(int child, int connection_pool, int backend)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I hope this will make your implementation regarding pgsql_pid easier.
>>>>>>>> For example, pool_coninfo(10, 0, 1) will return pointer to
>>>>>>>> ConnectionInfo corresponds to 1th backend pid which is in 0th
>>>>>>>> connection pool in 10th pgpool child.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sorry for not answering sooner. I thought you were working on adding
>>>>>>> pgsql_pid. There was a little misunderstanding :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Oh, I thought I woould work on pcp command, you would work on show
>>>>>> command. 
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> No problem :)
>>>>>
>>>>> I'll work on it ASAP.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> With your last commits, it makes it quite easy to do. Here is my new
>>>> patch. I still have an issue and perhaps you have an idea on how to
>>>> resolve it. Is there a way to know which connection is the active one in
>>>> a pool?
>>>
>>> This patch looks good and works good for me. Please commit.
>>> Would you please update doc/pgpool-en.html as well to add those new
>>> show commands?
>>
>> Do I have time to commit it only this monday (2010-08-09)? I would
>> really like to have this in pgPool-II 3.0, but I think I won't have time
>> to work on this before mondy morning.
> 
> No problem, please commit when you have time.

Done.

I had to fix my patch because I didn't take care the backend id. Right
now, it only looks at backend 0. Not sure this is a sensible thing to
do, but it would be easy to fix if it's not. Documentation is included
in the english HTML page.

Thanks.


-- 
Guillaume
 http://www.postgresql.fr
 http://dalibo.com


More information about the Pgpool-hackers mailing list