[Pgpool-general] Pgpool probelms

Nimesh Satam nimesh.satam at gmail.com
Wed Jun 17 12:01:55 UTC 2009


Tatsuo,

I am getting this on pgpool-II 2.2.2. I don't have any case studies ready at
this moment. But here are the data_logs below in the mail which might help
you. Three statements were passed S_1, S_2, S_3, but when the user
disconnected only S_1, S_3 got DEALLOCATED. Same happened at the end when
S_1 and S_3 were prepared after disconnection only S_1 got DEALLOCATED. Will
this be causing the problem.

*2009-06-17 03:15:07 PDT [11025]: [3-1] LOG:  duration: 0.437 ms  parse S_1:
BEGIN*
2009-06-17 03:15:07 PDT [11025]: [4-1] LOG:  duration: 0.009 ms  bind S_1:
BEGIN
*2009-06-17 03:15:07 PDT [11025]: [13-1] LOG:  duration: 0.009 ms  parse
S_2: COMMIT*
2009-06-17 03:15:13 PDT [11025]: [14-1] LOG:  duration: 0.042 ms  bind S_1:
BEGIN
*2009-06-17 03:16:10 PDT [11025]: [8071-1] LOG:  duration: 0.010 ms  parse
S_3: ROLLBACK*
2009-06-17 03:20:12 PDT [11025]: [43176-1] LOG:  duration: 0.025 ms
statement: BEGIN
2009-06-17 03:20:12 PDT [11025]: [43177-1] LOG:  duration: 0.019 ms
statement:  RESET ALL
2009-06-17 03:20:12 PDT [11025]: [43178-1] LOG:  duration: 0.106 ms
statement: COMMIT
2009-06-17 03:20:12 PDT [11025]: [43179-1] LOG:  duration: 0.009 ms
statement: BEGIN
2009-06-17 03:20:12 PDT [11025]: [43180-1] LOG:  duration: 0.021 ms
statement:  SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION DEFAULT
2009-06-17 03:20:12 PDT [11025]: [43181-1] LOG:  duration: 0.011 ms
statement: COMMIT
2009-06-17 03:20:12 PDT [11025]: [43182-1] LOG:  duration: 0.007 ms
statement: BEGIN
*2009-06-17 03:20:12 PDT [11025]: [43183-1] LOG:  duration: 0.019 ms
statement: DEALLOCATE "S_1"*
2009-06-17 03:20:12 PDT [11025]: [43184-1] LOG:  duration: 0.009 ms
statement: COMMIT
2009-06-17 03:20:12 PDT [11025]: [43185-1] LOG:  duration: 0.007 ms
statement: BEGIN
*2009-06-17 03:20:12 PDT [11025]: [43186-1] LOG:  duration: 0.010 ms
statement: DEALLOCATE "S_3"*
2009-06-17 03:20:12 PDT [11025]: [43187-1] LOG:  duration: 0.009 ms
statement: COMMIT
2009-06-17 03:20:15 PDT [11025]: [43188-1] LOG:  duration: 0.023 ms  parse
S_1: BEGIN
2009-06-17 03:20:15 PDT [11025]: [43189-1] LOG:  duration: 0.003 ms  bind
S_1: BEGIN*
2009-06-17 03:20:16 PDT [11025]: [43286-1] ERROR:  prepared statement "S_2"
already exists*
2009-06-17 03:20:17 PDT [11025]: [43288-1] LOG:  duration: 0.009 ms  bind
S_1: BEGIN
2009-06-17 03:20:21 PDT [11025]: [45950-1] LOG:  duration: 0.010 ms  parse
S_3: COMMIT
2009-06-17 03:20:31 PDT [11025]: [45951-1] LOG:  duration: 0.027 ms  bind
S_1: BEGIN
2009-06-17 03:25:58 PDT [11025]: [70834-1] LOG:  duration: 0.034 ms  bind
S_1: BEGIN
*2009-06-17 03:25:58 PDT [11025]: [70888-1] LOG:  duration: 0.012 ms
statement: DEALLOCATE "S_1"*

We have kept the *connection_cache = true *and the *reset_query_list =
'ABORT; RESET ALL; SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION DEFAULT'*

Regards,
Nimesh.



On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii at sraoss.co.jp> wrote:

> If you are getting this with pgpool-II 2.2.2, please send a
> self-contained test case if possible.
> --
> Tatsuo Ishii
> SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > We are using pgpool-II in Master-slave, Loadbalance mode and are facing
> > issues with the same. Can anybody lets us know what's going wrong here?
> >
> > 1) We are getting many entries in the database logs with following
> errors:
> > 2009-06-16 21:42:47 PDT [11040]: [2486-1] ERROR:  prepared statement
> "S_2"
> > already exists
> > 2009-06-16 21:43:04 PDT [11040]: [2535-1] ERROR:  prepared statement
> "S_3"
> > already exists
> > 2009-06-16 21:43:48 PDT [11040]: [2546-1] ERROR:  prepared statement
> "S_4"
> > already exists
> > 2009-06-16 21:43:49 PDT [11040]: [2564-1] ERROR:  prepared statement
> "S_5"
> > already exists
> > 2009-06-16 21:44:49 PDT [11040]: [2576-1] ERROR:  prepared statement
> "S_6"
> > already exists
> >
> > This causes the application to fail. {This was supposed to be fixed in
> 2.2.1
> > and later versions?}
> >
> > 2) We are seeing stuck queries when connecting through pgpool. ps U
> postgres
> > shows all the queries in bind state:
> >  5003 ?        Ss     0:52 postgres: ck rpro xxx.xx.xx.xx(52218) BIND
> >  5004 ?        Ss     0:28 postgres: ck rpro xxx.xx.xx.xx(52220) BIND
> > 18961 ?        Ss     0:54 postgres: ck rpro xxx.xx.xx.xx(34508) BIND
> > 18962 ?        Ss     0:39 postgres: ck rpro xxx.xx.xx.xx(34510) BIND
> >
> > This queries are not performing any activity and seem to have hanged.
> >
> > Both applications in question are Java applications and we are using the
> > postgres version 8.3.3
> >
> > Any help here would be much appreciated.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Nimesh.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://pgfoundry.org/pipermail/pgpool-general/attachments/20090617/c334e3a2/attachment.html>


More information about the Pgpool-general mailing list