[Pgpool-general] pgpool-II features doubts

Pedro Silva pedrovieirasilva at gmail.com
Fri Apr 24 15:43:45 UTC 2009


Hi Jaume,

Thank you for the answers. I'm on the right path :)

Thanks

Jaume Sabater wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 4:35 PM, Pedro Silva <pedrovieirasilva at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> 1.I would like to understand if my current configuration is a really
>> master-master configuration?
> 
> Sort of. It has a single point of entry, therefore it's not a
> master-master (it's just master), but commits are done on both nodes
> then returned to the client, therefore it's a synchronous cluster.
> 
>> 2. Load Balancing as it is activated will distribute my SELECT queries between
>> my two backends.
> 
> Yes.
> 
>> 3. If I now setup online recovery it doesn't matter if backend1 one or backend2
>> fails because recovery works from the one that is running, right?
> 
> Yes.
> 
>> 4. It is my understanding that recovery phase 1 will only finish when clients
>> terminate their connections. Won't this be a problem due to the fact that web
>> applications have normally a pool of connections that is kept between the
>> database and the application? This way the connections will never end and phase
>> 1 won't finish, right?
> 
> It means connections between clients and pgpool-II. pgpool-II will
> keep those, but cut the ones between pgpool-II and PostgreSQL. Also,
> pgpool-II will cut the latter and keep the first in a pool that will
> be attended once the online recovery is done. Also,
> connections/transactions will be drop after a timeout in case they
> have not finished/closed by themselves.
> 


More information about the Pgpool-general mailing list