[Pgpool-general] pgpool-II 2.1 beta1 release
Yoshiyuki Asaba
y-asaba at sraoss.co.jp
Tue Mar 18 06:16:41 UTC 2008
Hi,
Thank you for the report.
From: Nico Schottelius <nico-pgpool at schottelius.org>
Subject: [Pgpool-general] pgpool-II 2.1 beta1 release
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 17:06:34 +0100
> I am runnig 2.1beta1 right now and it looks good.
> Though we still have the multistatement issue:
It is a restriction. pgpool can't process mutistatement correctly.
You need to separate the query.
PQexec("SET DateStyle=ISO");
PQexec("SELECT oid, ...");
> I think I will do some performance tests, as currently pgpool-II-2.0.1 has
> worse results in some tests (as compared to pgpool-II-1):
>
> - using pgbench
> -c 128 -S results in 66k queries per second on pgpool-II-1,
> (this in cpu limited, one cpu is 100% used by pgpool)
> results in 52k queries per second on pgpool-II-2
> (this in interupt limited, one cpu is 100% used by irqs)
> Using three servers as backend
I do a performance test on pgpool-II 2.1 beta1 and pgpool-II 1.x.
* pgpoo.conf
replication_mode = true
load_balance_mode = true
backend_hostname0 = 'host1'
backend_port0 = 5432
backend_weight0 = 1
backend_hostname1 = 'host2'
backend_port1 = 5432
backend_weight1 = 1
* Database
% createdb -p 9999 bench
% pgbench -p 9999 -i bench
* Test result
pgpool-II 1.x:
% pgbench -p 9999 -c 30 -t 50000 -S bench
starting vacuum...end.
transaction type: SELECT only
scaling factor: 1
number of clients: 30
number of transactions per client: 50000
number of transactions actually processed: 1500000/1500000
tps = 25042.736682 (including connections establishing)
tps = 25115.801846 (excluding connections establishing)
pgpool-II 2.1 beta:
% pgbench -p 9999 -c 30 -t 50000 -S bench
starting vacuum...end.
transaction type: SELECT only
scaling factor: 1
number of clients: 30
number of transactions per client: 50000
number of transactions actually processed: 1500000/1500000
tps = 28030.279205 (including connections establishing)
tps = 28054.699482 (excluding connections establishing)
I could not see a performance difference.
Could you try pgpool-II 2.1 beta in your test environment?
Regards,
--
Yoshiyuki Asaba
y-asaba at sraoss.co.jp
More information about the Pgpool-general
mailing list