[Pgpool-general] termination of maintenance for pgpool

[Marcelo Martins]

I second that

Sent from my iPhone

On Dec 19, 2008, at 8:23, Daniel.Crespo at l-3com.com wrote:

> No objections here. Actually, I don't see advantages of pgpool over
> pgpool-II, so I think it's better to put effort on pgpool-II.
>
> Daniel
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgpool-general-bounces at pgfoundry.org
> [mailto:pgpool-general-bounces at pgfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Tatsuo  
> Ishii
> Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 8:40 PM
> To: pgpool-general at pgfoundry.org
> Subject: [Pgpool-general] termination of maintenance for pgpool
>
> Hi pgpool users,
>
> I would like to propose to terminate of maintenance for pgpool(not
> pgpool-II). It seems there's no reason to continute to use pgpool, and
> actually there are very few people who are still using pgpool.
> And, of course, resource for developing is precious so I think it
> would be more productive to focus on pgpool-II developement.
>
> Comments? suggestions?
> --
> Tatsuo Ishii
> SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
> _______________________________________________
> Pgpool-general mailing list
> Pgpool-general at pgfoundry.org
> http://pgfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/pgpool-general
> _______________________________________________
> Pgpool-general mailing list
> Pgpool-general at pgfoundry.org
> http://pgfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/pgpool-general